第4章

I have an immense respect for a man of talents PLUS "the mathematics." But the calculating power alone should seem to be the least human of qualities, and to have the smallest amount of reason in it; since a machine can be made to do the work of three or four calculators, and better than any one of them.Sometimes Ihave been troubled that I had not a deeper intuitive apprehension of the relations of numbers.But the triumph of the ciphering hand-organ has consoled me.I always fancy I can hear the wheels clicking in a calculator's brain.The power of dealing with numbers is a kind of "detached lever" arrangement, which may be put into a mighty poor watch - I suppose it is about as common as the power of moving the ears voluntarily, which is a moderately rare endowment.

- Little localized powers, and little narrow streaks of specialized knowledge, are things men are very apt to be conceited about.

Nature is very wise; but for this encouraging principle how many small talents and little accomplishments would be neglected! Talk about conceit as much as you like, it is to human character what salt is to the ocean; it keeps it sweet, and renders it endurable.

Say rather it is like the natural unguent of the sea-fowl's plumage, which enables him to shed the rain that falls on him and the wave in which he dips.When one has had ALL his conceit taken out of him, when he has lost ALL his illusions, his feathers will soon soak through, and he will fly no more.

"So you admire conceited people, do you?" said the young lady who has come to the city to be finished off for - the duties of life.

I am afraid you do not study logic at your school, my dear.It does not follow that I wish to be pickled in brine because I like a salt-water plunge at Nahant.I say that conceit is just as natural a thing to human minds as a centre is to a circle.But little-minded people's thoughts move in such small circles that five minutes' conversation gives you an arc long enough to determine their whole curve.An arc in the movement of a large intellect does not sensibly differ from a straight line.Even if it have the third vowel as its centre, it does not soon betray it.The highest thought, that is, is the most seemingly impersonal; it does not obviously imply any individual centre.

Audacious self-esteem, with good ground for it, is always imposing.

What resplendent beauty that must have been which could have authorized Phryne to "peel" in the way she did! What fine speeches are those two: "NON OMNIS MORTAR," and "I have taken all knowledge to be my province"! Even in common people, conceit has the virtue of making them cheerful; the man who thinks his wife, his baby, his house, his horse, his dog, and himself severally unequalled, is almost sure to be a good-humored person, though liable to be tedious at times.

- What are the great faults of conversation? Want of ideas, want of words, want of manners, are the principal ones, I suppose you think.I don't doubt it, but I will tell you what I have found spoil more good talks than anything else; - long arguments on special points between people who differ on the fundamental principles upon which these points depend.No men can have satisfactory relations with each other until they have agreed on certain ULTIMATA of belief not to be disturbed in ordinary conversation, and unless they have sense enough to trace the secondary questions depending upon these ultimate beliefs to their source.In short, just as a written constitution is essential to the best social order, so a code of finalities is a necessary condition of profitable talk between two persons.Talking is like playing on the harp; there is as much in laying the hand on the strings to stop their vibrations as in twanging them to bring out their music.

- Do you mean to say the pun-question is not clearly settled in your minds? Let me lay down the law upon the subject.Life and language are alike sacred.Homicide and VERBICIDE - that is, violent treatment of a word with fatal results to its legitimate meaning, which is its life - are alike forbidden.Manslaughter, which is the meaning of the one, is the same as man's laughter, which is the end of the other.A pun is PRIMA FACIE an insult to the person you are talking with.It implies utter indifference to or sublime contempt for his remarks, no matter how serious.Ispeak of total depravity, and one says all that is written on the subject is deep raving.I have committed my self-respect by talking with such a person.I should like to commit him, but cannot, because he is a nuisance.Or I speak of geological convulsions, and he asks me what was the cosine of Noah's ark;also, whether the Deluge was not a deal huger than any modern inundation.

A pun does not commonly justify a blow in return.But if a blow were given for such cause, and death ensued, the jury would be judges both of the facts and of the pun, and might, if the latter were of an aggravated character, return a verdict of justifiable homicide.Thus, in a case lately decided before Miller, J., Doe presented Roe a subscription paper, and urged the claims of suffering humanity.Roe replied by asking, When charity was like a top? It was in evidence that Doe preserved a dignified silence.

Roe then said, "When it begins to hum." Doe then - and not till then - struck Roe, and his head happening to hit a bound volume of the Monthly Rag-bag and Stolen Miscellany, intense mortification ensued, with a fatal result.The chief laid down his notions of the law to his brother justices, who unanimously replied, "Jest so." The chief rejoined, that no man should jest so without being punished for it, and charged for the prisoner, who was acquitted, and the pun ordered to be burned by the sheriff.The bound volume was forfeited as a deodand, but not claimed.

People that make puns are like wanton boys that put coppers on the railroad tracks.They amuse themselves and other children, but their little trick may upset a freight train of conversation for the sake of a battered witticism.