第39章 OSTIG IN SKY(4)

Next in dignity to the Laird is the Tacksman;a large taker or lease-holder of land,of which he keeps part,as a domain,in his own hand,and lets part to under tenants.The Tacksman is necessarily a man capable of securing to the Laird the whole rent,and is commonly a collateral relation.These tacks,or subordinate possessions,were long considered as hereditary,and the occupant was distinguished by the name of the place at which he resided.He held a middle station,by which the highest and the lowest orders were connected.He paid rent and reverence to the Laird,and received them from the tenants.This tenure still subsists,with its original operation,but not with the primitive stability.

Since the islanders,no longer content to live,have learned the desire of growing rich,an ancient dependent is in danger of giving way to a higher bidder,at the expense of domestick dignity and hereditary power.The stranger,whose money buys him preference,considers himself as paying for all that he has,and is indifferent about the Laird's honour or safety.The commodiousness of money is indeed great;but there are some advantages which money cannot buy,and which therefore no wise man will by the love of money be tempted to forego.

I have found in the hither parts of Scotland,men not defective in judgment or general experience,who consider the Tacksman as a useless burden of the ground,as a drone who lives upon the product of an estate,without the right of property,or the merit of labour,and who impoverishes at once the landlord and the tenant.

The land,say they,is let to the Tacksman at six-pence an acre,and by him to the tenant at ten-pence.Let the owner be the immediate landlord to all the tenants;if he sets the ground at eight-pence,he will increase his revenue by a fourth part,and the tenant's burthen will be diminished by a fifth.

Those who pursue this train of reasoning,seem not sufficiently to inquire whither it will lead them,nor to know that it will equally shew the propriety of suppressing all wholesale trade,of shutting up the shops of every man who sells what he does not make,and of extruding all whose agency and profit intervene between the manufacturer and the consumer.They may,by stretching their understandings a little wider,comprehend,that all those who by undertaking large quantities of manufacture,and affording employment to many labourers,make themselves considered as benefactors to the publick,have only been robbing their workmen with one hand,and their customers with the other.If Crowley had sold only what he could make,and all his smiths had wrought their own iron with their own hammers,he would have lived on less,and they would have sold their work for more.The salaries of superintendents and clerks would have been partly saved,and partly shared,and nails been sometimes cheaper by a farthing in a hundred.But then if the smith could not have found an immediate purchaser,he must have deserted his anvil;if there had by accident at any time been more sellers than buyers,the workmen must have reduced their profit to nothing,by underselling one another;and as no great stock could have been in any hand,no sudden demand of large quantities could have been answered and the builder must have stood still till the nailer could supply him.

According to these schemes,universal plenty is to begin and end in universal misery.Hope and emulation will be utterly extinguished;and as all must obey the call of immediate necessity,nothing that requires extensive views,or provides for distant consequences will ever be performed.

To the southern inhabitants of Scotland,the state of the mountains and the islands is equally unknown with that of Borneo or Sumatra:

Of both they have only heard a little,and guess the rest.They are strangers to the language and the manners,to the advantages and wants of the people,whose life they would model,and whose evils they would remedy.

Nothing is less difficult than to procure one convenience by the forfeiture of another.A soldier may expedite his march by throwing away his arms.To banish the Tacksman is easy,to make a country plentiful by diminishing the people,is an expeditious mode of husbandry;but little abundance,which there is nobody to enjoy,contributes little to human happiness.

As the mind must govern the hands,so in every society the man of intelligence must direct the man of labour.If the Tacksmen be taken away,the Hebrides must in their present state be given up to grossness and ignorance;the tenant,for want of instruction,will be unskilful,and for want of admonition will be negligent.The Laird in these wide estates,which often consist of islands remote from one another,cannot extend his personal influence to all his tenants;and the steward having no dignity annexed to his character,can have little authority among men taught to pay reverence only to birth,and who regard the Tacksman as their hereditary superior;nor can the steward have equal zeal for the prosperity of an estate profitable only to the Laird,with the Tacksman,who has the Laird's income involved in his own.

The only gentlemen in the Islands are the Lairds,the Tacksmen,and the Ministers,who frequently improve their livings by becoming farmers.If the Tacksmen be banished,who will be left to impart knowledge,or impress civility?The Laird must always be at a distance from the greater part of his lands;and if he resides at all upon them,must drag his days in solitude,having no longer either a friend or a companion;he will therefore depart to some more comfortable residence,and leave the tenants to the wisdom and mercy of a factor.